The media and Washington establishment are up-in-arms because the status quo is being disrupted this voting season, and it seems that most pundits are at a loss as to what is driving the masses to the “horrible” figures of Mr. Trump and Mr. Cruz.
The driving narrative is that there is a group of angry voters who are racist, xenophobic, misogynistic, homophobic, and whatever other demeaning term you can come up with who just cannot be brought to their senses.
Now why would a group of voters be angry? Just look at the last paragraph. People get tired of repeatedly being called names. Instead of thoughtful discussion of issues and a recognition that there are valid points on multiple sides, the media stoops to name calling and lambasting a large percentage of the population because they don’t understand them.
This reminds me of the often misquoted statement by Pauline Kael after the 1972 Presidential election, “I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them.”
The media does not understand people like me. But instead of doing real journalism, which might actually require work and travelling outside of their comfortable jobs in Washington, they choose to sit back and take cheap pot-shots with name-calling.
Don’t believe me? Just a sampling of the op-eds today gives loads of evidence, to wit: Americans (a “shocking number” of them) are “petulant, impudent” says Frank Bruini in the aging grey lady. “Obnoxiousness is the new charisma, “he writes. He calls Donald Trump “a jerk” and says that Ted Cruz speaks with “nastiness that’s by turns adolescent and hyperbolic”. He says that these voters are “so distrustful of the usual etiquette that they think valor lies in viciousness, integrity in insult.”
In his usual Democratic Party spin-meister mode, Dana Milbank, who wouldn’t know journalism if it bit him in the toe, says that Cruz and Trump have “stoked the fires of resentment and xenophobia”. Unabashedly he declares “There is no equivalent on the left these days to such nasty stuff.”
And Dan Balz in the Washington Post says that a growing group of voters has “resentment toward cultural shifts that reflect the diversity and tolerance of a changing country”. Note the terminology used – illegal immigration is a reflection of “diversity” and “tolerance”, but calling for the government to actually follow the law is termed as “resentment”.
This is the consequence of political correctness run amok. Frank discussion is “obnoxious”. Clear talk apparently can no longer go on without clouding everything in a blanket of ‘not-that-I-am-implying-everybody-associated-with-X-thinks-this’ or ‘I-know-he-is-a-mass-murderer-(not-to-imply-that-there-is-anything-wrong-with-that)-but-if-you-can-just-try-to-understand-his-feelings-you-would-be-ok-with-the-fact-that-he-killed-and-ate-your-family’.
The fact is that there used to be a sense of right and wrong in this country. There used to be a sense that we were ruled by laws. Now I am actually a very tolerant person, and what you do in your own living room is no business of mine, be it sex, drugs, or whatever. Just leave me out of it.
But for the past seven years we have been shown that the laws are in fact very political. They are only to be used against the enemies of the state. Oh, and the laws are only for the little people. The IRS scandal? “Nothing to see here” Due process on campus? “You are an oppressive male so you are by nature a rapist”.
And now there is clear proof that Hillary Clinton has committed multiple felonies. But no one in the establishment seems to care! Why doesn’t Jeb Bush use his $50 million war chest to good use and do a campaign about how Hillary Clinton should be in jail, instead of his greasy campaign against Marco Rubio? The New York Times and the Washington Post need look no further than their front pages if they want an explanation of why their readership has suffered – it is a disgrace to this country that this story has not been covered properly.
So yes, there is anger, but it is not without cause. And is not because of latent racism or bigotry. It is because the institutions that we hold so dearly have been blighted with indignities that may have shattered this country to the core beyond repair.